EP#215 | DSD | JD Vance Wins VP Debate, Iran Escalates, & War Talk Gets Real
📄 Episode Overview
In Episode #215 of Deep Shallow Dive, Ray breaks down the VP debate between JD Vance and Tim Walz, calling out the mainstream media spin and highlighting Vance’s composure and surprising stance on Israel. He explores why Vance’s performance felt authentic, how the media’s reaction reveals political bias, and why Trump’s foreign policy record still resonates with voters. Ray closes by addressing the Iran-Israel missile exchange and poses a hard-hitting question to parents: are you ready to send your kids to war?
🔑 Key Takeaways
🎙️ JD Vance Wins on Style and Substance
Ray believes JD Vance won the debate—citing his calm presence, clear answers, and ability to connect with viewers across party lines.
📺 Mainstream Media Can’t Handle the Truth
MSNBC and other left-leaning outlets blasted Vance post-debate, exposing their cognitive dissonance and unwillingness to acknowledge his performance.
🇮🇱 Vance’s Israel Comments Surprise Everyone
JD Vance’s less aggressive stance on Israel’s military response caught many off guard—including conservatives—and hinted at a shift from blind support.
🇺🇸 Trump's Foreign Policy: No Wars
Ray reminds listeners that Trump was the only president in decades not to start a new war—calling it a fact, not an opinion.
🎭 Tim Walz: The Mime Emoji Come to Life
Ray pokes fun at Walz’s expressions but concedes he didn’t perform terribly—aside from a bizarre moment when caught misrepresenting his Tiananmen Square history.
🧠 Can We Agree on Anything?
Ray urges listeners to rethink the idea that bipartisan agreement is taboo—citing several moments of mutual respect during the debate.
☢️ Iran Escalation Sparks Big Questions
As tensions between Iran and Israel grow, Ray points out Iran poses no threat to the U.S.—and challenges warmongers pushing for conflict.
👨👩👦 Would You Send Your Kid to War?
A direct message to parents: if you have kids aged 18–25, are you truly ready to send them to Ukraine or the Middle East to fight?
⏱️ Chapters & Timestamps
00:00 – Episode intro and VP debate setup
01:25 – JD Vance’s strong debate performance
03:24 – Media bias post-debate breakdown
07:01 – Tim Walz: decent but flawed
09:00 – Policy vs. personality reflections
10:56 – Vance’s surprise Israel stance
14:47 – Trump’s no-war presidency examined
17:30 – Walz’s Tiananmen Square controversy
20:41 – Civil discourse and debate decorum
22:44 – Iran strikes Israel – What’s next?
24:47 – Are we ready to send our kids to war?
🎯 Conclusion
This episode blends sharp analysis, political honesty, and emotional weight. Whether breaking down media spin or asking tough questions about war, Ray calls on listeners to wake up and engage.
❓ FAQ
Q: Why does Ray think JD Vance won the debate?
A: Because of Vance’s poise, clarity, and ability to stay composed—qualities that resonated even across political lines.
Q: What did JD Vance say about Israel?
A: He offered a surprisingly measured take, saying it’s up to Israel to defend itself—breaking from typical GOP talking points.
Q: What’s the big takeaway on Iran?
A: Iran isn’t a threat to the U.S., but warmongers inside America are. That’s Ray’s core warning.
📢 Follow Deep Shallow Dive on Social Media
📌 Facebook
📌 Instagram
📌 TikTok
📌 YouTube
📌 Twitter
📌 Threads
📌 Substack
🔑 Keywords
JD Vance VP debate, Tim Walz debate reaction, Iran Israel missile news, JD Vance Israel stance, Trump no new wars, mainstream media bias debate, Tiananmen Square Tim Walz, Ray Doustdar podcast, Deep Shallow Dive
🗂️ Categories
U.S. Politics, Middle East, Debate Analysis, Media Critique
🏷️ Tags
JD Vance, Tim Walz, Iran, Israel, VP Debate, Trump, Deep Shallow Dive
