EP#373 | DSD | Was Charlie Kirk Changing? Tucker, Candace & the Questions No One’s Asking

📄 Episode Overview

In Episode #373 of Deep Shallow Dive, Ray Doustdar delivers a searing solo breakdown of the mounting controversy surrounding the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Was his death just a tragic anomaly, or was it the culmination of a quiet ideological shift? Ray replays new clips from Tucker Carlson, analyzes Candace Owens' recent revelations, and deconstructs the internet’s most viral theories. With the sharpness of a cultural detective and the cadence of a late-night radio truth-teller, Ray asks whether Kirk—long seen as a staunch Israel supporter—was beginning to drift toward a different perspective, perhaps aligned more with the likes of Candace, Tucker, or even Dave Smith. This episode is less about conclusions and more about asking the right—and often censored—questions.

🎯 Key Takeaways

• Charlie Kirk’s final months included ideological hints of change, especially regarding Israel.
• Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens offer insight into Kirk's shifting private views.
• Online breakdowns of the official narrative around Kirk's death expose inconsistencies, raising deeper questions.

🧠 Summary

Ray opens with a heartfelt behind-the-scenes story about how feedback from a listener to guest Dr. Brian became a life-affirming moment, emphasizing the butterfly effect of kindness. He then pivots to the meat of the episode: the web of unanswered questions surrounding Charlie Kirk’s assassination. Ray highlights the surreal contradictions in the official narrative—from impossible rifle disassembly to planted patsies—drawing on viral Instagram videos and special forces debunkings.

As the episode intensifies, Ray amplifies clips from Tucker Carlson, who recounts how Charlie was losing donors after pledging to bring him to Turning Point events, and even reveals how Kirk privately distanced himself from Netanyahu while staying publicly silent. Candace Owens enters the narrative through a leaked text message from Kirk quoting Kanye West, suggesting a deeper, shared ideology that may have never surfaced publicly.

Ray doesn’t shy away from tough critiques either. While he empathizes with Kirk's pressure, he criticizes his silence on Gaza atrocities despite allegedly being "appalled" by them. The takeaway? Kirk’s growing dissonance between public persona and private perspective may have been the very fulcrum that made his platform too dangerous for powerful forces.

With surgical precision, Ray dissects the potential motives behind the assassination: Who gains from Kirk’s death? Who loses from his continued rise? He ends with a warning—not just about who controls narratives, but about what happens when those narratives begin to fracture.

🔎 Practical Tips

• Don’t dismiss “official” narratives without scrutiny—ask who gains and who loses.
• Value and share feedback; it can change lives.
• Document private thoughts—texts and receipts matter in high-stakes public life.

📚 Research Spotlight

Green Berets and special forces veterans debunk rifle disassembly timeline — this analysis supports Ray’s skepticism about the official account.

❓FAQ

Q: Was Charlie Kirk showing signs of changing his views on Israel?
A: According to Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens, yes—he expressed concern over Netanyahu’s actions and may have been slowly shifting.

Q: Who would benefit most from Charlie Kirk’s death?
A: Ray suggests applying the logic: who gains vs. who loses—hinting at geopolitical motives, especially from foreign actors.

Q: Why is the crime scene’s quick dismantling controversial?
A: The area was cleared within minutes without standard investigative protocol, leading many to suspect a cover-up.

Q: What role did media like the Jerusalem Post play?
A: Strangely, the Jerusalem Post reported Kirk’s death before major U.S. outlets, raising flags about how early and why they knew.

Q: How did Candace Owens factor into this story?
A: She maintained a deep friendship with Kirk, and her leaked texts reveal a possibly different side of Charlie than his public image conveyed.

⏱️ Chapters & Timestamps

• 00:00 – Opening & Listener Feedback
• 04:50 – Recap of Dr. Brian & Bart Sabrell Episodes
• 07:53 – Reopening the Charlie Kirk Investigation
• 10:39 – The Rifle, the Roof, and the Cover-up
• 19:02 – Tucker & Netanyahu’s Simultaneous Tweets
• 22:31 – Was Charlie Pivoting? The Tucker Connection
• 25:22 – Tucker’s First-Hand Insights
• 29:43 – Gaza, Integrity & Public Silence
• 33:32 – The Kanye West Text Leak
• 38:09 – Charlie’s 2023 Gaza Prediction
• 42:44 – A Complicated Legacy
• 46:37 – Ray’s Final Thoughts & Outro

🧭 Final Thought

Charlie Kirk's death left a void—but what if the real story isn’t who killed him, but what he was becoming?

🌍 External Resources

• Jerusalem Post breaking coverage of Kirk’s death
• American Jewish Committee’s statement on Charlie Kirk

⚙️ Squarespace SEO Settings

Meta Title: Was Charlie Kirk Changing? | DSD EP373
Meta Description: EP373 explores Charlie Kirk’s possible ideological shift, featuring Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, and a breakdown of suspicious events around his death.
Suggested Tags & Keywords: Charlie Kirk assassination, Tucker Carlson, Candace Owens, Turning Point USA, Netanyahu controversy, Gaza opinions, political censorship, Charlie Kirk final days

📢 Social Sharing Snippet

“Was Charlie Kirk quietly changing sides—and was that the real threat?” – Click to Tweet

🔗 Social & Links

Follow us on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/deepshallowdive
Like us on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/deepshallowdive
Watch on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@deepshallowdive
Follow us on TikTok: https://www.tiktok.com/@raydoustdar
Follow us on X: https://x.com/deepshallowdive
Join us on Threads: https://www.threads.com/@deepshallowdive
Subscribe on Substack: https://deepshallowdive.substack.com/